- Written by
- Scaffold Exchange Team
- Published
- September 26, 2026
- Reading time
- 6 min
Two levels of training
Section 1926.454 sets two different training requirements, and mixing them up is the most common gap on a job site. Every employee who works on a scaffold needs user training. Every employee who erects, dismantles, moves, operates, repairs, maintains or inspects a scaffold needs erector training, which goes further and must be delivered by a competent person.
User training (1926.454(a))
Anyone who performs work while on a scaffold must be trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards of the scaffold type they are using and the procedures to control them. The standard lists what that training must cover:
- The nature of electrical hazards, fall hazards and falling-object hazards in the work area
- The correct procedures for dealing with electrical hazards and for erecting, maintaining and disassembling the fall protection and falling-object protection systems being used
- The proper use of the scaffold and the proper handling of materials on it
- The maximum intended load and the load-carrying capacities of the scaffold
- Any other pertinent requirements of Subpart L
This is the training the plasterer, the mason, the electrician and the painter need before stepping onto a scaffold someone else built. A general "fall protection" toolbox talk does not satisfy it unless it covers these points for the scaffold type in use.
Erector and inspector training (1926.454(b))
Anyone involved in erecting, disassembling, moving, operating, repairing, maintaining or inspecting a scaffold must be trained by a competent person to recognize the hazards associated with that work. The required content:
- The nature of scaffold hazards
- The correct procedures for erecting, disassembling, moving, operating, repairing, inspecting and maintaining the type of scaffold in question
- The design criteria, maximum intended load-carrying capacity and intended use of the scaffold
- Any other pertinent requirements of Subpart L
Note that "inspecting" is on the list. The person who does the pre-shift inspection needs this level of training, not just user training.
What a competent person is
The definition has two halves and both are tested. Capability comes from training and experience with the scaffold type in use; a competent person for frame scaffold is not automatically competent for a two-point suspended scaffold. Authority comes from the employer: the person must be able to stop work and order corrections without asking permission. A safety officer who has to call the project manager before pulling people off a scaffold does not meet the definition.
Subpart L gives the competent person specific jobs. They inspect before each shift (1926.451(f)(3)). They supervise every erection, move, alteration and dismantling, and select the trained employees who do it (1926.451(f)(7)). They decide whether fall protection is feasible for erectors and dismantlers (1926.451(g)(2)). They judge whether mixed-manufacturer components are sound (1926.451(b)(10)), whether work may continue in wind (1926.451(f)(12)), and they train the erectors (1926.454(b)).
A qualified person is a different role: someone with a degree, certificate, professional standing, or extensive knowledge and experience who has demonstrated the ability to solve problems in the subject. Scaffolds must be designed by a qualified person (1926.451(a)(6)), and a registered professional engineer is required for frame or tube-and-coupler scaffolds over 125 feet and for pole scaffolds over 60 feet. On a large job you may have all three roles held by three different people.
What "scaffold certification" means
OSHA does not certify scaffold workers and does not issue scaffold cards or licenses. When a job posting asks for a "certified scaffold builder" or a "scaffold competent person card", it is asking for one of three things:
- Employer-issued training records showing the worker completed 1926.454 user or erector training for the scaffold type. This is the only thing OSHA itself requires.
- Third-party training certificates, typically a one-day competent person course or a multi-day erector course from a training provider, a manufacturer, or an industry body such as the Scaffold & Access Industry Association. These are widely respected and are what most owners mean by "certified", but they are voluntary.
- State or local credentials. A few jurisdictions go beyond federal OSHA. New York City, for example, requires Department of Buildings-approved supported and suspended scaffold courses for workers and supervisors on many jobs. Check the local rules wherever you are working.
Manufacturer training is worth singling out. System scaffolds such as ring-lock and cup-lock have proprietary connections and load tables, and several manufacturers run erector courses on their own product. Owners of industrial plants often require it for that reason.
Suppliers in the directory that offer training can be filtered under Scaffold Training, and those that certify installations or people under Scaffold Certifications.
Records: what OSHA asks to see
Unlike the fall protection standard (1926.503), which demands a written certification record for each trained employee, 1926.454 does not spell out a documentation requirement. Do not read that as permission to skip it. A compliance officer who asks "how do you know this employee was trained?" needs an answer, and the only good one is a record.
Keep, for each employee: the date of training, the scaffold types covered, the topics covered (mapped to the list in 1926.454), the name and qualifications of the trainer, and evidence of understanding such as a signed test or a practical evaluation. Keep erector training separately from user training, and record the competent person's appointment in writing, with their authority spelled out.
When retraining is required
Section 1926.454(c) requires retraining when the employer has reason to believe an employee lacks the skill or understanding needed to work safely. Three triggers are named:
- Changes at the worksite present a hazard the employee was not trained for
- Changes in the type of scaffold, fall protection, falling-object protection or other equipment present a hazard the employee was not trained for
- Inadequacies in the employee's work involving scaffolds show that they have not retained the required proficiency
There is no fixed refresher interval in the federal rule. Many employers and most owner programs adopt an annual refresher anyway, and a new scaffold system or a new site is always a trigger. A crew that has only ever built frame scaffold needs retraining before its first system scaffold, whatever their cards say.